WESTERN
Enrique Dussel: on atheism and liberation theology
Enrique Dussel, Ethics and the theology of liberation
(Orbis: NY 1978)
The prophets against the Idol. The atheism of Jesus
... Those are the systems that people make and adore; they are their laws,
statutes, economic and cultural organizations. All this is the work of humankind
but it is called "God." ... If we accept these gods as gods, we can get along
very nicely, but some day we are going to wake up to the fact that we have been
adoring an idol and not God, not Jesus.
This means then that in order to give witness to the Lord, we have to deny the
idol, and to deny the idol that purports to be God is atheism with a small
"a." The prophets were atheists in regard to false gods and so were the
Christians. ...
Only if I am an atheist in regard to that god can I testify to the God who is
Creator; if I deny God the Creator, then I become divine. There are only two
possibilities, not three. Atheism itself is not wrong; it is a matter of saying
to what God I am being atheistic. Unjust and dehumanizing atheism is the
Atheism of the "God-Other," Atheism with a capital "A." The atheism of the
idol is spelled with a small "a." We can love God the Creator only if we are
atheists in regard to the false god, the idol. Atheism then is not the
problem. 14-15
Enrique Dussel, Philosophy of liberation (Orbis: NY 1985)
- 3.4.3
- Atheistic antifetishism
- 3.4.3.1
- To deny the divinity of a fetishized system is authentic
atheism.
It is the negation of a negation.
- 3.4.3.3
- Marx says that atheism as a pure negation of essentiality no
longer makes sense; atheism negates a god (fetish) and affirms, by reason of this
negation, the existence of human beings, of the poor, of the oppressed. For this
very reason Feuerbach said that it is necessary to abandon the Hegelian
fetishistic theology and open up to anthropology (to the other person). Such
atheisms are a precondition of the possibility of liberative revolution and of
support exterior to the prevailing present system.
- 3.4.4.3
- The practical affirmation of atheism is the struggle
for justice. That is, whoever fights for the liberation of the poor affirms in a
practical manner that the system is unjust, that it is not divine.
- 3.4.4.5
- Pure atheism, without affirmation of the infinite
Other, is not sufficiently critical; it permits the fetishization of a future
system. Only if it is affirmed that the divine is other than all possible systems
will liberating revolution be possible. Hence disbelief in the
fetish-atheism must be affirmed as the exteriority of the absolute and of
the Origin.
- 3.4.5.1
- Atheism vis-à-vis the fetish is the negative
precondition for revolution; affirmation of absolute Exteriority is the
affirmative and definitive precondition for liberation. Both preconditions are
practical. It is in action that the fetish is denied and Exteriority
affirmed-when one assumes responsibility for the oppressed.
97-100
|
|